Comments on: Great Firewall of Britain http://nocky100.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/great-firewall-of-britain/ Musings of Ian Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:47:45 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Proxor http://nocky100.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/great-firewall-of-britain/#comment-157 Proxor Sat, 27 Dec 2008 00:49:01 +0000 http://nocky100.wordpress.com/?p=224#comment-157 There's a lot of useful information on this site. Thanks a lot! There’s a lot of useful information on this site.
Thanks a lot!

]]> By: How the Great Firewall of Britain works | Drupal Test http://nocky100.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/great-firewall-of-britain/#comment-152 How the Great Firewall of Britain works | Drupal Test Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:49:29 +0000 http://nocky100.wordpress.com/?p=224#comment-152 [...] Great Firewall of Britain [...] [...] Great Firewall of Britain [...]

]]> By: The PHA : links for 2008-12-11 http://nocky100.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/great-firewall-of-britain/#comment-151 The PHA : links for 2008-12-11 Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:17:13 +0000 http://nocky100.wordpress.com/?p=224#comment-151 [...] Great Firewall of Britain « The Nock Blog (tags: security privacy news technology surveillance uk wikipedia proxy ning) [...] [...] Great Firewall of Britain « The Nock Blog (tags: security privacy news technology surveillance uk wikipedia proxy ning) [...]

]]> By: How the Great Firewall of UK Works | jimmyblake.com http://nocky100.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/great-firewall-of-britain/#comment-150 How the Great Firewall of UK Works | jimmyblake.com Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:33:05 +0000 http://nocky100.wordpress.com/?p=224#comment-150 [...] found a link to an excellent description of how the platform works, think basic - very basic.  I know that whatever solution is used needs to be low touch because of [...] [...] found a link to an excellent description of how the platform works, think basic – very basic.  I know that whatever solution is used needs to be low touch because of [...]

]]> By: Our IWF Implementation | Community Site News http://nocky100.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/great-firewall-of-britain/#comment-149 Our IWF Implementation | Community Site News Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:16:35 +0000 http://nocky100.wordpress.com/?p=224#comment-149 [...] it, so that’s the purpose of this blog. The Plusnet IWF implementation has been covered on The Nock Blog, BoingBoing the The Guardian. The Wikipedia coverage can be read on [...] [...] it, so that’s the purpose of this blog. The Plusnet IWF implementation has been covered on The Nock Blog, BoingBoing the The Guardian. The Wikipedia coverage can be read on [...]

]]> By: Alex http://nocky100.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/great-firewall-of-britain/#comment-148 Alex Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:02:28 +0000 http://nocky100.wordpress.com/?p=224#comment-148 Somewhat more detailed diagrams are published here: http://www.slideshare.net/flyingpotato/netclean-whitebox-by-practeo-presentation It's a sales presentation of the censorship system. The presentation can be downloaded as a PDF file. Somewhat more detailed diagrams are published here:

http://www.slideshare.net/flyingpotato/netclean-whitebox-by-practeo-presentation

It’s a sales presentation of the censorship system.
The presentation can be downloaded as a PDF file.

]]> By: Tynan on Tech » Sex, censorship, and the Net http://nocky100.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/great-firewall-of-britain/#comment-147 Tynan on Tech » Sex, censorship, and the Net Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:41:04 +0000 http://nocky100.wordpress.com/?p=224#comment-147 [...] That caused large swaths of Wikipedia to be inaccessible across the pond; the IWF’s blacklist also blocked access to parts of Flickr and, yes, Ning (though apparently not the dirty [...] [...] That caused large swaths of Wikipedia to be inaccessible across the pond; the IWF’s blacklist also blocked access to parts of Flickr and, yes, Ning (though apparently not the dirty [...]

]]> By: Blown to Bits » Blog Archive » Privatized Censorship http://nocky100.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/great-firewall-of-britain/#comment-145 Blown to Bits » Blog Archive » Privatized Censorship Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:51:36 +0000 http://nocky100.wordpress.com/?p=224#comment-145 [...] sites containing illegal child pornography. Because of some technicalities that are well explained here, that led to Wikipedia being uneditable from most computers in the UK. There was a furor, the [...] [...] sites containing illegal child pornography. Because of some technicalities that are well explained here, that led to Wikipedia being uneditable from most computers in the UK. There was a furor, the [...]

]]> By: Filtering breaks down | Mutterings from the HQ http://nocky100.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/great-firewall-of-britain/#comment-144 Filtering breaks down | Mutterings from the HQ Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:09:29 +0000 http://nocky100.wordpress.com/?p=224#comment-144 [...] The IWF has now backed down from censoring an image on Wikipedia, the censorship of which was adjudged by many to be too wide ranging by taking in the entire page, in addition to the fact that the image (although not nice) was generally available in libraries, record stores and online download services. The secondary impact was the blocking of anonymous editing of Wikipedia from the whole of the UK due to mechanism of filtering used, as presented on my personal blog. [...] [...] The IWF has now backed down from censoring an image on Wikipedia, the censorship of which was adjudged by many to be too wide ranging by taking in the entire page, in addition to the fact that the image (although not nice) was generally available in libraries, record stores and online download services. The secondary impact was the blocking of anonymous editing of Wikipedia from the whole of the UK due to mechanism of filtering used, as presented on my personal blog. [...]

]]> By: Ian D. Nock http://nocky100.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/great-firewall-of-britain/#comment-143 Ian D. Nock Tue, 09 Dec 2008 15:25:00 +0000 http://nocky100.wordpress.com/?p=224#comment-143 Child Pornagraphy, maybe not - that would be for a court to decide. Offensive, bad taste, nasty.. yes. Child Pornagraphy, maybe not – that would be for a court to decide.
Offensive, bad taste, nasty.. yes.

]]>